![]() Select the JSON checkbox in the Validate also area to verify. ![]() Specify the maximum number of problems to report maxerr, the maximum line length maxlen, and the predefined global variables by names or through object keys predef. In the Assume area, specify the targeted environment to check the code for. Learn more about JSLint options from the JSLint official website. To skip problems of a certain type, select the checkbox next to this type. By default, the tool reports detected problems of all types. In the Tolerate area, specify the types of problems you do not want JSLint to report. After that the other controls on the page become available. In the Settings/Preferences dialog Ctrl+Alt+S, go to Languages and Frameworks | JavaScript | Code Quality Tools | JSLint, and select the Enable checkbox. JSLint is a static analysis tool to locate and correct style problems in Javascript (ECMAScript etc.) source code. To enable JSLint and configure its behavior in IntelliJ IDEA Note that JSLint does not fully support the latest ECMAScript features. This extension supports the 'jslint. I'm going to rewrite an example from MDN's page, " Introduction to Object Oriented Programming," which itself uses this liberally.IntelliJ IDEA lets you verify your JavaScript code using the built-in JSLint tool. The VS Code JSLint extension looks for a local or global npm installation of jslint. ![]() That caveat aside, here's what I'd suggest doing for OO JavaScript that passes Beta JSLint (as of today, anyhow). Many Git commands accept both tag and branch names, so creating this branch may cause unexpected behavior. It parses and analyzes a source file, returning an object with information about the file. It supports all major JSLint options and lets you decide to Run JSLint on buffer save and/or on buffer switch. (I'm still waiting for an updated Good Parts, though.) A tag already exists with the provided branch name. This PlugIn actually runs jslint.js within Rhino. He replied, but ignored the solution I'm going to present, below, which I think means that it's okay, the same way JSLint doesn't complain if something passes muster. Your question bugged me, and I signed up for Crockford's JSLint discussion group and asked. So in other words, JSLint doesn't automatically expect me to use a constructor pattern? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |